Powered by Invision Power Board


  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> WATERLESS URINALS, GOOD THING OR NOT?
 
Do you think we should specify waterless urinals?
YES [ 0 ]  [0.00%]
NO [ 2 ]  [50.00%]
YES BUT CERTAIN LIMITED USE [ 2 ]  [50.00%]
Total Votes: 4
Guests cannot vote 
David DeBord
Posted on January 16, 2006 12:12 pm
Quote Post


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Member No.: 3
Joined: January 16, 2006



What's your opinion?
PMEmail Poster
Top
Digital M@
Posted on May 19, 2006 12:50 pm
Quote Post


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Member No.: 13
Joined: May 19, 2006



I voted, yes, but limited applications.

I feel the storage of and the changing of chemicals, smell and the chance of mineral deposits eliminate it from high use appliations. I also worry about the cost of having to run piping for regular urinals if the owner is not happy with the waterless ones.

There are a variety of urinals that use 1/2 gallon flushes for LEEDS or water sensative applications. I would prefer to see the 1/2 gallon flush urinals specified.
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll