| Site Home |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| David DeBord |
Posted on January 16, 2006 12:12 pm
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1 Member No.: 3 Joined: January 16, 2006 |
What's your opinion?
|
| Digital M@ |
Posted on May 19, 2006 12:50 pm
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1 Member No.: 13 Joined: May 19, 2006 |
I voted, yes, but limited applications.
I feel the storage of and the changing of chemicals, smell and the chance of mineral deposits eliminate it from high use appliations. I also worry about the cost of having to run piping for regular urinals if the owner is not happy with the waterless ones. There are a variety of urinals that use 1/2 gallon flushes for LEEDS or water sensative applications. I would prefer to see the 1/2 gallon flush urinals specified. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |